With the interim frenzy of military engineers (from the USA, Israël, India??, Germany??, & a couple of other nation-states) building nuclear weapons facilities; upgrading many sorts of instruments of massive destruction--in Israël-- are they aiming at starting a global apocalyptic conflagration by killing more américans and blaming it on some nonexistent brotherhood of terrorists, thereby compelling plain citizens by deception into going to shoot village farmers in Afghanistan...and elsdwheres under the label of anti-terrorism?
People, 'soldiers', 'newscommunicators',... it's time to stop listening to ACIA, Mossad, & their likes. These are the [original] inventors of international terrorism. Or why is it that alQIM et al were practically dormant until américan intel' commando s started paying "special visit" to the Maghreb some years before? We have to stop serving the caprices of these bastard minds...
----------
Sent from my Nokia Phone
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
United murderers of america...
No...!
Why? Why not?! Because of Osama?
No !
Because of Ghaïlani?
No!
Because of Mehsud?
No !
Allende?
Qaddafi?
........
No! None at all! Mr Husain Baraka Obama & his leutenants and comrades in bloodshed (the united murderers of America et al) have been impeached by the divine. They're going to drown in the sea of (human) blood they've shed and are shedding...
----------
Sent from my Nokia Phone
Monday, September 17, 2012
this particular killing in Libya
Brain-wash(ing) education, brainwash education is causing complication & insecurity everywhere; I don't knooow why...----Marxwel Udọ (musician)
Ọdịghị mma mmadụ ịdị ka ihe e ji kọọ ya ọnụ {It's not proper for a man to assume the nature of the nuisance as which he has been derisively caricatured}----Moses Alugburu (one of very few Nigerians who remain'd consistently worthy of trust when I transacted with'im)
I do hear & do read about "agent provocateur". And we do joke that if one wants to cage a fowl, especially domestic chick, place grains of corn or rice in a line into the cage. The chicken lacks both the intelligence and the intellect requisite for evaluating anything beyond the grains of rice.
But like an anti-Sesse Seko rebel in then Zaïre who in turn "got strogly fed up" with Kabilah said, after Laurent Desirée Kabila was murdered: we don't like this killing, this death; we don't believe in killing people. We believe in changing for the better the evil system that makes some of us (appear to be) enemies in the views of some others of us.
Of course moral & social sanity demand that one "believe not" in killing, or even injuring any humanbeing else excepting 'lawfully convicted, sentenced, criminals'.
...condolences to the family, friend, relations, nation & admirers of the deceased victims & the survivors...
*I feel that who kills other people because he has been insulted deserves something more or worse than insult. (And because the killed were not verified to be involved in the insulting; and the killer didn't even mind to find out the real source & the nature & aim of the insult, & the actual insulter...) he deserves Guantanamo Bay; he deserves the death-gases released into some cave-chambers in Afghanistan during USA's ealier hunt for their arch-friend turned arch-enemy.
I wonder why people capable of sanity refuse to be sane. Why do people who say they worship Allah, and who despise others for not worshipping exactly in their manner, constitute themselves fuses that ignite further dis-worshipping of God?
Can't they wait for a few days or a week: to "look", to peep into the cloud of things--events & nonevents? This is 'an insult'; not a physical aggression. Even if it is, are they their god's god?
An un-ignorable probability exists: the 'insult' exuding from that artwork was not aimed at the grand prophet of mussulimism, nor at genuine practicers of islam. Instead, it is aimed at able-bodied but thoughtless worms; intendedly they would brainlessly (visionlessly) take certain well know actions of their inclination that will justify real anti-islamism, generally or in some regions or nations...
This sort of thing reminds me of a priest expelled from priesthood in Georgia (E Europe). Although he was no longer a christian either by conduct or by office, he continued to lead others, especially the youth, into unspeakable atrocities in his locality in the name of christianism.
Some years before now, a great bookwriter wrote a book (or books?) specifically intended (or maybe, sincerely unintended. Just a work of artistic flavour) to degrade the prophethood and messiahship of Jesus the Christ. How did the believers in & apologetics of this Unique prophet respond? They first studied the book well. Then they brought forth counter-narratives as appealing as--some more appealing than--the great book. Defence websites (e.g. www.jesusdecoded.com) sprang up, constructed by (the) defenders of the christian religion's faith.
Now, what's the status of the book(s)? It's a best-seller; but just one of the many best-sellers there are. Nothing more.
Had those who felt insulted taken to the use of brutish might, they'd have achieved for the gifted writer what he would never have achieved by only writing & publishing a book. And the INTELLECTual creativity involved in & expanded by the processes of contructing those responses would've been lost too.
Had "the people" waited a bit and "looked", instead of following and opportunedly raising the morale of "the killers", they'd have seen the finger or even a whole hand of the facultative enemies of human progress. The hand is what deserves being cut down (not embassy officers or anyone else merely branded) using different strategies & tactics.
Remember, there's a monstrous Mussolini in Ụrụ-shalima desperately designing all sorts of ways with his co-(oil) robbers, the Hitlers in Washing-town, to increase misery among mankind.
Sunday, September 16, 2012
CLASSIFIED GOSSIP (2)
two yet-peaceful countries. Benin's so fraught with 'organisations non-Gouvernementales', I wonder what else of sociality,organisation-wise, do people engage in. Is NGO-ism all?
Then look further at the peaceless ones undergoing, or recov'ring from, turmoils, natural and human-contrived...
They say he 'savvy book'; so there's no doubt the Jo' knows the implications of these & more. But they are his internal & external power roots; a sort of political investment. His techno-phobic attitudes: under his watch, the industry of real industrializers was not only figuratively but also literally being burnt down...so that no gifted indigenous substitute could breach the profit of local compradors & their off-shore masters, typify this.
When you depend on others, especially territorial & political foreigners, for your basic food, basic medicine, basic education,--things you are yourself capable of--you are, or have become at best, an appendage of those others, or something worse: a marionette in their hand; no matter how well you try at rationalizing your laziness or incompetence or... as interdependence of nations.
Government for the profit of foreign bodies.
The government chairmanship of Mr Gudlock was throwing away somethings that any technosophic or techno-philic authority would rejoice to have.
Then look further at the peaceless ones undergoing, or recov'ring from, turmoils, natural and human-contrived...
They say he 'savvy book'; so there's no doubt the Jo' knows the implications of these & more. But they are his internal & external power roots; a sort of political investment. His techno-phobic attitudes: under his watch, the industry of real industrializers was not only figuratively but also literally being burnt down...so that no gifted indigenous substitute could breach the profit of local compradors & their off-shore masters, typify this.
When you depend on others, especially territorial & political foreigners, for your basic food, basic medicine, basic education,--things you are yourself capable of--you are, or have become at best, an appendage of those others, or something worse: a marionette in their hand; no matter how well you try at rationalizing your laziness or incompetence or... as interdependence of nations.
Government for the profit of foreign bodies.
The government chairmanship of Mr Gudlock was throwing away somethings that any technosophic or techno-philic authority would rejoice to have.
Friday, September 14, 2012
CLASSIFIED GOSSIP (1)
Much of the so-called state secrets or classified information is often merely labelled so. They are neither secrets nor stately. Classified rubbish is what they are. Determined & methodic observers (with some gymnastic flexibility of mind) who "look hard enough" will always see thru the cover... Plus the presence of some hands from among the keepers of the nebules and boxes of the 'secrets' who deliberately remove the cover or flash an illumination...out of grievance or sympathy or love of private profit; in which instance one won't have to "look hard" to be able to scoop "things" into one's conscious awareness.
So Nigerian officials who quickly blamed Jamaat ul Ahlil Sunna lidawati Wal Jihad
(ɓoko-hɛrem) over "leaked" data... seem to me to be running faster ahead of what they are chasing; unless they prove they spoke from thorough inquest, and not from speculation and convoluted defence of official carelessness, dutilessness or even sabotage.
* * *
Let's say it the way it is: that in Nigeria, those who complained of prez Jonathan's payments to the "area soldiers" of the ocean-front around the mouth of River Niger didn't do so because of the economic injustice or the uneconomic-ness (of) policy those huge payments represent. They complained at the fact that they are not yet included among the beneficiaries of that (soft) injustice; perhaps also for no prospects of ever being included. You know, nigerian Nigerians want lux by ALL means & methods, even when it's obvious that keeping to or staying in such luxury constitutes an imminent disaster. This is in Nigeria.
But there're other facets.
I can gossip loudly now: The Jo' and his co-cavorters 'don't give a dam' not because of sureness of loyalty of the national army (if the official armed agencies of Nigeria can still be called national. I feel they are more factually described as a huge & very varied petro-dollar army) or constitutional backing. It's because of the apparently surer
money-procured loyalty of the gun-goons of the Niger creeks. With such huge payments, which are not even enough for their intended purposes, the "generals" & their "boys" will be able to maintain a life-style of relative lux & a conglomeration of formidable arsenals (capable of frightening Osama of Laden & his USAmérican friends into forgoing an attack or "thinking twice" of any planned aggression)...
In a dreadfully segregated society as this, whose unity is based far more on distrust than on trust (a new visitor concentrating on the ceremonials will be fooled; but will understand when he appraises the informal realities), suppose the northern marauders succeed in procuring saboteurs from among The Jo's "prætorian guards" to aggresse him and his nearests, that's, suppose they ask (him) "the dreaded once-in-a-lifetime question, who'll answer them?
Is it the talk-talking, sybaritic,
english grammarians & church-talkers of SW Nigeria? Is it the unrealistic self-kidnapping able-bodied of SE Nigeria, who: what they lack in politicality they make up in internecine criminality. Even the mediocre political sense, the only level of politics Africa seems capable of, is above'em.
Intra-Nigerianly, the man, Jonathan, is pragmatic after all; he knows Nigeria(ns) enough to know where to set his foothold s...
But this strand of Nigeria's fabric of militiae are "doing something", at least guarding against "security agents" sabotaging petrol(eum) transport lines...
OTHER FACETS
1.
National & sub-national legislatives' culture of resource-squandering elitism...
2.
EFCC's confraternisation with thieves: it spends 3 or more times what it struggles to recover, in billions of...
3.
The Federal Central Territory (FCT) has been declared officially out-of-bound to the poor, in a Nigeria of probably 99% beggarly populace...
4.
The (impending) islamic bank is just another in the line of conceptions of the loot...
5.
And what about Mr Jo's gradual re-insertion of Nigeria into the sleeve-pockets of Worldbank, IMF, and some other institutions of foreigner con-artistry?
6.
How do you explain his signing off huge amounts of money into foreigners' purses thru "Innovative Action on AIDS"? When no real actions, let alone innovative ones, are taken in housing & agriculture...
Is Mr Jo', up till now ignorant of the facts that AIDS-promoting NGO's represent a fraudulent estab' of central north America; that they incorporate elements of medical truth in a huge broth of medical fraud to make dupes of peoples globally, thereby keeping themselves in lucrative but abominable careers? Like portable télephones, the AIDS-business is harmfully bottomless...
Even if "sympathy for the sick" makes him tolerate the near-intolerable AIDS-born public dupings, can't he see that no country infested by foreigner-funded NGO's advances (industrially)? Besides, such NGO's are conductors of "foreign state pirates"...
They are de-industrializers and de-stabilizers...
Just look at Bolivia & Bénin,
So Nigerian officials who quickly blamed Jamaat ul Ahlil Sunna lidawati Wal Jihad
(ɓoko-hɛrem) over "leaked" data... seem to me to be running faster ahead of what they are chasing; unless they prove they spoke from thorough inquest, and not from speculation and convoluted defence of official carelessness, dutilessness or even sabotage.
* * *
Let's say it the way it is: that in Nigeria, those who complained of prez Jonathan's payments to the "area soldiers" of the ocean-front around the mouth of River Niger didn't do so because of the economic injustice or the uneconomic-ness (of) policy those huge payments represent. They complained at the fact that they are not yet included among the beneficiaries of that (soft) injustice; perhaps also for no prospects of ever being included. You know, nigerian Nigerians want lux by ALL means & methods, even when it's obvious that keeping to or staying in such luxury constitutes an imminent disaster. This is in Nigeria.
But there're other facets.
I can gossip loudly now: The Jo' and his co-cavorters 'don't give a dam' not because of sureness of loyalty of the national army (if the official armed agencies of Nigeria can still be called national. I feel they are more factually described as a huge & very varied petro-dollar army) or constitutional backing. It's because of the apparently surer
money-procured loyalty of the gun-goons of the Niger creeks. With such huge payments, which are not even enough for their intended purposes, the "generals" & their "boys" will be able to maintain a life-style of relative lux & a conglomeration of formidable arsenals (capable of frightening Osama of Laden & his USAmérican friends into forgoing an attack or "thinking twice" of any planned aggression)...
In a dreadfully segregated society as this, whose unity is based far more on distrust than on trust (a new visitor concentrating on the ceremonials will be fooled; but will understand when he appraises the informal realities), suppose the northern marauders succeed in procuring saboteurs from among The Jo's "prætorian guards" to aggresse him and his nearests, that's, suppose they ask (him) "the dreaded once-in-a-lifetime question, who'll answer them?
Is it the talk-talking, sybaritic,
english grammarians & church-talkers of SW Nigeria? Is it the unrealistic self-kidnapping able-bodied of SE Nigeria, who: what they lack in politicality they make up in internecine criminality. Even the mediocre political sense, the only level of politics Africa seems capable of, is above'em.
Intra-Nigerianly, the man, Jonathan, is pragmatic after all; he knows Nigeria(ns) enough to know where to set his foothold s...
But this strand of Nigeria's fabric of militiae are "doing something", at least guarding against "security agents" sabotaging petrol(eum) transport lines...
OTHER FACETS
1.
National & sub-national legislatives' culture of resource-squandering elitism...
2.
EFCC's confraternisation with thieves: it spends 3 or more times what it struggles to recover, in billions of...
3.
The Federal Central Territory (FCT) has been declared officially out-of-bound to the poor, in a Nigeria of probably 99% beggarly populace...
4.
The (impending) islamic bank is just another in the line of conceptions of the loot...
5.
And what about Mr Jo's gradual re-insertion of Nigeria into the sleeve-pockets of Worldbank, IMF, and some other institutions of foreigner con-artistry?
6.
How do you explain his signing off huge amounts of money into foreigners' purses thru "Innovative Action on AIDS"? When no real actions, let alone innovative ones, are taken in housing & agriculture...
Is Mr Jo', up till now ignorant of the facts that AIDS-promoting NGO's represent a fraudulent estab' of central north America; that they incorporate elements of medical truth in a huge broth of medical fraud to make dupes of peoples globally, thereby keeping themselves in lucrative but abominable careers? Like portable télephones, the AIDS-business is harmfully bottomless...
Even if "sympathy for the sick" makes him tolerate the near-intolerable AIDS-born public dupings, can't he see that no country infested by foreigner-funded NGO's advances (industrially)? Besides, such NGO's are conductors of "foreign state pirates"...
They are de-industrializers and de-stabilizers...
Just look at Bolivia & Bénin,
Monday, August 27, 2012
I experienced it
For the first time I experienced it; I experienced the practical meaning of what the writer or last canonic editor of the biblic book of Corinthians meant by 'gaining nil in being lovelessly poured away like libation'. (1?? Corinthians 13:??)
I had doubted, even openly question'd the possibility of expending oneself for other people and not be loving those others. For a long time. But some necessity to enter and re-enter Nigeria, and to spend length periods (13 days to a dozen weeks at a time) in it since early 2011 has answered me.
I 'm always aware of the sinister possibility of getting nigerianized in this large society where the operative "acquired" instinct is "Survival of the sneakiest". To start a character of "godfully" making promises that, ab initio, I have no intention of fulfilling; and of zealously preaching what I do not believe. Well, not yet; probably n-ever!
I don't take pride in any religion(s) [especially the institutionalized ones]. But I revere the 'recorded' prophets: for their "cleverness" or providential foresight. And I even have some admiration for people who still gather enough conviction, or courage, or illusion...to publicly preach conventional religion conventionally.
But I know that whom I cannot trust, I usually don't love well.
The 'masaukin baƙi' (guest houses) are always full of people who punctuate every word they speak with the name of the Holy god. Even those who openly admit membership of the violent jihadist groups of Nigeria: alias ɓoko-hɛrɛm, tho' their colleagues do warn them to be quiet on that...
But with almost all, one can't engage in any transaction and not get made a dupe of at any point where extra trust is involved; and this with abrasive, inflated ego...
Although I give of myself to'em in ways I hadn't thought I could-- we are a community--I'm almost sure I don't love them more than that. And if I do, I don't feel it; just cold performances by which to get by.
I had doubted, even openly question'd the possibility of expending oneself for other people and not be loving those others. For a long time. But some necessity to enter and re-enter Nigeria, and to spend length periods (13 days to a dozen weeks at a time) in it since early 2011 has answered me.
I 'm always aware of the sinister possibility of getting nigerianized in this large society where the operative "acquired" instinct is "Survival of the sneakiest". To start a character of "godfully" making promises that, ab initio, I have no intention of fulfilling; and of zealously preaching what I do not believe. Well, not yet; probably n-ever!
I don't take pride in any religion(s) [especially the institutionalized ones]. But I revere the 'recorded' prophets: for their "cleverness" or providential foresight. And I even have some admiration for people who still gather enough conviction, or courage, or illusion...to publicly preach conventional religion conventionally.
But I know that whom I cannot trust, I usually don't love well.
The 'masaukin baƙi' (guest houses) are always full of people who punctuate every word they speak with the name of the Holy god. Even those who openly admit membership of the violent jihadist groups of Nigeria: alias ɓoko-hɛrɛm, tho' their colleagues do warn them to be quiet on that...
But with almost all, one can't engage in any transaction and not get made a dupe of at any point where extra trust is involved; and this with abrasive, inflated ego...
Although I give of myself to'em in ways I hadn't thought I could-- we are a community--I'm almost sure I don't love them more than that. And if I do, I don't feel it; just cold performances by which to get by.
Friday, August 17, 2012
Netanyahu's apology to Hitler
There is something exponentially wrong with [the mentation of] "leaders" who hurry to massacre their people in the name of protecting them. The sinister preparations, overt & covert, of Judæo-American war-brewers toward an imminent 'confrontation' with Iran is a symptom or a syndrome of some deadly dementia.
They chant to the world that the authorities of the Ay't'llah Republic are attempting to lay their hand on the handle of unconventional weapons with the sole purpose of wiping Israel off the surface of the earth.
Does that sound reasonable? Can they really get us believing that Iran is wholly composed of unreasoning lunatics who couldn't evaluate that: if they have 10 nuclear warheads, "the others" have 10 times 10; still "the further others" have 10 times 10,000?
Too much about nothing!
This has been done before. USA's propagandists had sometime zestfully wanted the whole world to believe that once Nor'Korea acquires thermo-nuclear (nucleo-thermal) weapon, it'd be blastering every corner of our planet with it...
In fact, Mr Ahmadinejad's speech in 2005, was deliberately mistranslated to give it unsavoury, excitatory public hue in English. The man never said 'Israel should or shall be wiped off the earth' in the original speech in Farsi. The speech really was not a glorification of Yerushalem ('Qod' in Farsi (persian)), but neither was it about wiping it off.
If the jewish state has any enemy {that will wipe it off...}, it's not Iran; not Hîsbollah, or any other raving formation. The greatest threat to Isræl are within it; they are the imperialist war-mongers, "les marchands de mort", managing its affairs now or in the future.
But if Isræl, whether as Pentagon's spearhead or independently, attacks Persia, then they & their allies et al should apologise to the late Mr Adolph Hitler and his Goebbeline accolytes...
Away with this "hollow democracy"! How is it that state officials professing and proclaiming the people's mandate are so subtly anti-people!?
Anyway, whoever says that his neighbour will not sleep, himself will not too. And the doctor or pharmacist that brews diarrhœa sooner than later falls diarrhic along with his targets.
MY WORD TO THE ISRÆLIS
As recorded in the gospels, at the trial of the GrandTeacher & Instructor, one of the officiating personnel said: "It's better for one man to die than for the whole nation to perish..."
It is better that The real enemy, the ones within, disguised in intimate appellations, be got rid of than for millions to be sacrificed to their egoïstic glory. The sado-genocidists.
Even if Iranians are a bunch of "wẹre yọko yọko" (complete, unreserved lunatics), which they are not, in fact, whoever is running naked in pursuit of a naked mad fellow in order to apprehend and beclothe the mad one is himself no saner than his target. He may even be madder!
They chant to the world that the authorities of the Ay't'llah Republic are attempting to lay their hand on the handle of unconventional weapons with the sole purpose of wiping Israel off the surface of the earth.
Does that sound reasonable? Can they really get us believing that Iran is wholly composed of unreasoning lunatics who couldn't evaluate that: if they have 10 nuclear warheads, "the others" have 10 times 10; still "the further others" have 10 times 10,000?
Too much about nothing!
This has been done before. USA's propagandists had sometime zestfully wanted the whole world to believe that once Nor'Korea acquires thermo-nuclear (nucleo-thermal) weapon, it'd be blastering every corner of our planet with it...
In fact, Mr Ahmadinejad's speech in 2005, was deliberately mistranslated to give it unsavoury, excitatory public hue in English. The man never said 'Israel should or shall be wiped off the earth' in the original speech in Farsi. The speech really was not a glorification of Yerushalem ('Qod' in Farsi (persian)), but neither was it about wiping it off.
If the jewish state has any enemy {that will wipe it off...}, it's not Iran; not Hîsbollah, or any other raving formation. The greatest threat to Isræl are within it; they are the imperialist war-mongers, "les marchands de mort", managing its affairs now or in the future.
But if Isræl, whether as Pentagon's spearhead or independently, attacks Persia, then they & their allies et al should apologise to the late Mr Adolph Hitler and his Goebbeline accolytes...
Away with this "hollow democracy"! How is it that state officials professing and proclaiming the people's mandate are so subtly anti-people!?
Anyway, whoever says that his neighbour will not sleep, himself will not too. And the doctor or pharmacist that brews diarrhœa sooner than later falls diarrhic along with his targets.
MY WORD TO THE ISRÆLIS
As recorded in the gospels, at the trial of the GrandTeacher & Instructor, one of the officiating personnel said: "It's better for one man to die than for the whole nation to perish..."
It is better that The real enemy, the ones within, disguised in intimate appellations, be got rid of than for millions to be sacrificed to their egoïstic glory. The sado-genocidists.
Even if Iranians are a bunch of "wẹre yọko yọko" (complete, unreserved lunatics), which they are not, in fact, whoever is running naked in pursuit of a naked mad fellow in order to apprehend and beclothe the mad one is himself no saner than his target. He may even be madder!
Monday, August 13, 2012
BAKASSI
The Camerouns was a german colonial territory turned french
after European 2nd World War.
Historically, All official maps from colonial time, beginning about 1883-1914, to post-independence period of Nigeria between 1960 to 1993, located Bakassi and the surrounding islands in the Camerouns. The inhabitants were mostly village fisher-folk: nigerians (west) & camérounians (east).
During the Nigerian Fratricide, commonly called Nigeria-Biafra war, the head of government in Nigeria, Mr. Gowon, pledged [nigerian side of] Bakassi to Ahidjo's Cameroun for aid against the Biafrans. Ahidjo who grew up in N E Nigeria was already anti-Biafra...
Cameroun fulfilled her part of this"informal pact"...
After the war, Gowon partially formalized the pact, by what is called Marwa Declaration. Marwa (Maroua) is a town in N Caméroun. But the two countries continued disputing over the péninsula through the (late) nineteen seventies. Negotiations and boundary commissions procured no definite results.
In 1981, Camerounian security agents aggressed their Nigerian counterparts in Bakassi. Some lives were lost. This led to partial militarization of the area: from Akwa Yafe river to Boro Camp. Skirmishes occasionally occurred.
During the regime of Mr. Abacha, Nigeria openly occupied Bakassi. Abacha himself gave it the status of LGA (local government area). But it was also then that they nigerianly made a mess of the whole diplomacy and politics over Bakassi. Not by the occupation but by the droves of official and unofficial negotiators who wrangled among themselves for estacodes.
Cameroun prudently discerned that Nigeria had very weak case whatever her military or populational might. She took the matter to the International Court. By the IC's verdict, Camerounian state got back {that's, legitimized the "ownership" of} what had always been hers.
Mr. Obasanjo started to implement that verdict. It culminated under Mr. Yarad on August 14, 2008. This is the GreenTree Agreement.
Nigerian governments complacently mis-informed the populace. So, many people combined the illusion, the ignorance, mischievous patriotism, plus the thirst for the petroleum in Bakassi, in making a huge babel of the transference.
Probably, many of the people of Bakassi would have, unconfusedly, become Camerounians if they wouldn't relocate {or pay rents...} as advised by some high-ranking officials involved in the affair. But some clever crooks among Nigerian executives and officials have calculated to use them as a ladle to spoon huge funds into their private bank accounts. That's why they induced the translocation of the population of west Bakassi...
Bakassi, from the past and by politics, belongs in the Camerouns.
* * *
The present developments there are both surprising and unsurprising. They elicit some questions.
Is nigerian go'ment secretly attemting to "retake" the whole of Bakassi?
...after spending all those time & resources implemeting Green Tree?
Or are somebodies being goaded on by a mental picture of private wealth if they could preside over the issuance of licenses for oil extraction (BAKASSI is "oily") ?
* * *
To me, one of the things Mr Obasanjo got excellently right was the "obedience" to the verdict...
At that time, the next option was war; and I think it still is. You can guess well who'd participate in the war & for what reasons...
And don't forget that the immediate target of "the missiles" are afiriKan 'brothers'...who of their own natural will, neither make weapons nor make war for pétroleum; and who can freely give the field to each other, unmindful of the modern-wealth that nature had put underneath.
In a nation where gov'ments delight in keeping the governed in ignorance, blind & zealous patriotism may prove very dangerous; may engender unimaginable disasters...
10 times the population of Bakassi may get wasted in military conflagration, to the profit of foreigners, and the problem would still be intactly unsolved...
There's a big question here: to what use were the huge resources marked out for resettlement of bakassi indigens and denizens put...? ...that they are crying 'neglect' so soon
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Super Terrorist
What are happening in the world today along global capitalist economy show that had al-Qaeda never existed, USA's power managers and their co-war merchants of war would create one. Any mask for war-mongering is welcome. They love war the way maggots love rotten things.
We are seeing in a decade, a fast-paced globalisation of war, poverty and TYRANNY [tyranny & contracted anarchty packaged in democracy labels= the tranny from the USA].
Obama and colleagues are fixated at Reagan's "war to the world" foreign policy. 'Talking' peace and 'walking' war, exciting frenetic love of weapons in other peoples across the world. Schizophrenic media sing their glory. Democracy, populace-centered system, is disappearing. Most governments now use force, not persuasion, in interactions with their subjects. And they start with deception.
If the USA are still adequately democratic, why do they engage in "these wars" in opposition to the wishes of Americans?
The economy is not advancing. Instead, we (the human creatures) are advancing stupidly toward a deadliest of Global Mass Destructions!
They are putting veracity to some of the words Ozama bn Laden:
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
This People Are Naïve
Sweet but useless.
This people are naïve, at least in this dimension. I mean those urging Mrs Clinton to tackle Mr Jonathan concerning Nigerga.
1.
nigerian Nigerians are not rational peoples; so you don't go applying reasoning with'em when they are not yet tired...
2.
"The trouble(s)" in Nigeria is a lucrative one. The stupendous quantities of resources being channelled into (gun-pivoted branch of) security, though unsustainable, is a great opportunity to (in)security contractors. They'll "resourcefully", nigerianly, prolong the troubles...Don't be deceived by official public speeches or statements.
I personally feel that Mr Jonathan is a political imbecile. But I also feel that the most intelligent, atruistic, nigeria-centric, person or project will waste a lot and achieve very little, even nothing, stability-wise with the Nigeria of today.
I think it better to urge a fulscale restructuring of Nigeria that'd incorporate some efficient native sanction system, especially in dealing with fretricidal hypocrisies. I say this because I have dossiers of several instances of sponsors and instigators of public trouble, who should've been apprenhended and consigned to a lifetime in "isolated compounds" or even to eternal silence below the ground according to law, taking refuge in the corporate Nigeria and escaped justice...
Why? Because the crimes don't pain Aso Rock (Abuja) half as they do the direct victims.
3.
USA is a prime suspect in the violent insecurity afflicting W Africa et al nowadays. How do you expect an artful woman representing a rapacious superpower to be genuinely interested in the security of a bland field like Nigeria. Will she like the physical & the environmental climate? Will USA people come to live in Nigeria? This a populous part of Afrika: a continent that to global capitalist is only suitable as a market & source of raw materials, nothing else. Isn't internal instability a huge aid to the appropriation of peoples and territories into the fold of the 'empire' of which the Secretary of State is an envoy?
I have noticed that wherever there is heightened ACIA [américan central intelligence agency] activities, organized insecurity & public deception also heighten.
They who have fixated prez Jonathan, will they de-fixate him? I do not think so. Unless their interest, which is wide-ranging, including the prevention of China from cornering the only easily re-colonised continent, has changed.
This people are naïve, at least in this dimension. I mean those urging Mrs Clinton to tackle Mr Jonathan concerning Nigerga.
1.
nigerian Nigerians are not rational peoples; so you don't go applying reasoning with'em when they are not yet tired...
2.
"The trouble(s)" in Nigeria is a lucrative one. The stupendous quantities of resources being channelled into (gun-pivoted branch of) security, though unsustainable, is a great opportunity to (in)security contractors. They'll "resourcefully", nigerianly, prolong the troubles...Don't be deceived by official public speeches or statements.
I personally feel that Mr Jonathan is a political imbecile. But I also feel that the most intelligent, atruistic, nigeria-centric, person or project will waste a lot and achieve very little, even nothing, stability-wise with the Nigeria of today.
I think it better to urge a fulscale restructuring of Nigeria that'd incorporate some efficient native sanction system, especially in dealing with fretricidal hypocrisies. I say this because I have dossiers of several instances of sponsors and instigators of public trouble, who should've been apprenhended and consigned to a lifetime in "isolated compounds" or even to eternal silence below the ground according to law, taking refuge in the corporate Nigeria and escaped justice...
Why? Because the crimes don't pain Aso Rock (Abuja) half as they do the direct victims.
3.
USA is a prime suspect in the violent insecurity afflicting W Africa et al nowadays. How do you expect an artful woman representing a rapacious superpower to be genuinely interested in the security of a bland field like Nigeria. Will she like the physical & the environmental climate? Will USA people come to live in Nigeria? This a populous part of Afrika: a continent that to global capitalist is only suitable as a market & source of raw materials, nothing else. Isn't internal instability a huge aid to the appropriation of peoples and territories into the fold of the 'empire' of which the Secretary of State is an envoy?
I have noticed that wherever there is heightened ACIA [américan central intelligence agency] activities, organized insecurity & public deception also heighten.
They who have fixated prez Jonathan, will they de-fixate him? I do not think so. Unless their interest, which is wide-ranging, including the prevention of China from cornering the only easily re-colonised continent, has changed.
This People Are Naïve
"Church talk".
This people are naïve, at least in this dimension. I mean urging Mrs Clinton to tackle Mr Jonathan concerning Nigerga.
This people are naïve, at least in this dimension. I mean urging Mrs Clinton to tackle Mr Jonathan concerning Nigerga.
1.
nigerian Nigerians are not rational peoples; so you don't go applying reasoning with'em.
2.
"The trouble(s)" in Nigeria is a lucrative one. The stupendous quantities of resources being channelled into (gun-pivoted branch of) security, tho' unsustainable, is a great opportunity to (in)security contractors. They'll "resourcefully", nigerianly, prolong the troubles...Don't be deceived by official public speeches or statements.
I personally feel that Mr Jonathan is a political imbecile. But I also feel that the most intelligent, atruistic, nigeria-centric, person or project will waste a lot and achieve very little, even nothing, with the Nigeria of today.
I think it better to urge a fulscale restructuring of Nigeria that'd incorporate some efficient native sanction system, especially in dealing with fretricidal hypocrisies. I say this because I have dossiers of several instances of sponsors and instigators of public trouble, who should've been apprenhended and consigned a lifetime in "isolated compounds", or even to eternal silence below the ground, took refuge in the corporate Nigeria and escaped justice...
Why? Because the crimes don't pain Aso Rock (Abuja) half as they do the direct victims.
3.
USA is a prime suspect in the violent insecurity afflicting W Africa et al nowadays. How do you expect an artful woman representing a rapacious superpower to be genuinely interested in the security of a bland field like Nigeria. Will USA people come to live in Nigeria? Isn't internal instability a huge aid to the appropriation of peoples and territories into the fold of the empire?
I have noticed that wherever there is heightened ACIA [américan central intelligence agency] activities, organized insecurity & public deception also heighten.
They who have fixated prez Jonathan, will they de-fixate him? I do not think so. Unless their interest, which is wide-ranging, including the prevention of China from cornering the only easily re-colonised continent, has changed.
Monday, July 2, 2012
Nigeria-hɛrɛm?
Which is the hɛrɛm: Ɓoko or Nigeria¿?¿
Eziokwu adị' n'ọnụ emeela anyị ncha o {=absence of truth in our mouth has done us in}
----Teresa O. [musician]
Karatun ɓoko ba haram ba ne... {=Occidental booklearning is no evil at all...}
----Ghanaian visitor
THE REAL HƐRƐM WORKERS OF NIGERIA
They are now generally known by the appellation "Ɓoko Haram". But in practical reality this noun is much less true of them than it is of the others who call it.
The biggest practitioners of hɛrɛm here, those who are constantly turning Nigeria's wine into sewage, are almost exclusively found among the so-called educated people of Nigeria. They are the ones who make Europe-born book-learning here to appear to be only a process of sharpening one's talents for use in crime.
But for a few exceptions, this would just be an unmitigated fact. Independability, rat-mentality (a house rat never produces what it needs; it always steals them). Nothing is sacred. Even pensioneers' pensions. Though it's somewhat a retribution; some of the pensioneers actively partook in building this uncompromisingly corrupt complex that is now, in their turn, denying them their merits.
Two parties competing at hɛrɛm: the gov'ments and the un-islamic jihadists are not opposing forces. The two are working in the same direction. In short, they are unco-operatively co-operating. They hunt each other not as much because of their differentness as because of their similarity. The governments with only the difference (legitimacy) of a faint constitutionality make sure that people suffer and perish unnecessarily. What else are the book- tabooists making sure of?
And that's the pitiably unfortunate part of it all: that they'll go the nigerian way: succeeding or failing without establishing any definable concept; or any procedure for practicing some concept.
Why? Because so many of them are drug addicts; always intoxicated!
Might it be that their apparent braveries are mere by-products of the vagaries of intoxicants and intoxication? The very hɛrɛms they claim to be fighting against have become their mainstay!
private rigmarole
Nigeria-hɛrɛm?
Which is the hɛrɛm: Ɓoko or Nigeria¿?¿
Eziokwu adị' n'ọnụ emeela anyị ncha o {=absence of truth in our mouth has done us in}
----Teresa O. [musician]
Karatun ɓoko ba haram ba ne... {=Occidental booklearning is no evil at all...}
----Ghanaian visitor
THE REAL HƐRƐM WORKERS OF NIGERIA
They are now generally known by the appellation "Ɓoko Haram". But in practical reality this noun is much less true of them than it is of the others who call it.
The biggest practitioners of hɛrɛm here, those who are constantly turning Nigeria's wine into sewage, are almost exclusively found among the so-called educated people of Nigeria. They are the ones who make Europe-born book-learning here to appear to be only a process of sharpening one's talents for use in crime.
But for a few exceptions, this would just be an unmitigated fact. Independability, rat-mentality (a house rat never produces what it needs; it always steals them). Nothing is sacred. Even pensioneers' pensions. Though it's somewhat a retribution; some of the pensioneers actively partook in building this uncompromisingly corrupt complex that is now, in their turn, denying them their merits.
Two parties competing at hɛrɛm: the gov'ments and the un-islamic jihadists are not opposing forces. The two are working in the same direction. In short, they are unco-operatively co-operating. They hunt each other not as much because of their differentness as because of their similarity. The governments with only the difference (legitimacy) of a faint constitutionality make sure that people suffer and perish unnecessarily. What else are the book- tabooists making sure of?
And that's the pitiably unfortunate part of it all: that they'll go the nigerian way: succeeding or failing without establishing any definable concept; or any procedure for practicing some concept.
Why? Because so many of them are drug addicts; always intoxicated!
Might it be that their apparent braveries are mere by-products of the vagaries of intoxicants and intoxication? The very hɛrɛms they claim to be fighting against have become their mainstay!
private rigmarole
A ɓoƙo hɛrɛm's admirable point
Journalistic news writers call them ɓoko haram. The power-holders of Nigeria are shying away from detecting and blockading the sources of the instruments (especiall guns & 'munitions), information, et ceteris sequentia that feed their confidence and with which they "act".
They are also shying away, visionlessly, from acting towards "diffusing" the many other seeds of monstrosity that litter Nigeria waiting for opportunities to germinate.
They are also shying away, visionlessly, from acting towards "diffusing" the many other seeds of monstrosity that litter Nigeria waiting for opportunities to germinate.
They are there typifying the eternal lot of Nigeria.
And they are making things happen; they are making history, the kind of history typical of Nigeria.
The most prominent stuff operating in Nigeria, or better, operating Nigeria nowadays may not be deserving of any good word. But somethings of theirs are admirable; at least to the writer of this.
Should I put it this way: Can such seriousness of purpose still be found among Nigerians? Or are the "actors" non-Nigerians? Or is it that Nigerians seriously UNITE only for unconstructive endeavours? This people are tempting me to review my faith about the Nigerian.
Having swum thru much of the social streams of Nigeria...I have become embossed with a nagging conclusion that, apart from a relatively few non-typicals, no two Nigerians [ever] agree on anything in practice. When they pretend to do, the agreement rarely last beyond one month. And so nigerians' unity on issues always exists on paper pages and screens of television sets only.
These apostles of ulterior agenda are unknowingly presenting themselves as different. Different and 'disciplined' ( if not expert) strategists with sufficient seriousness of intention. When they say " We'll attack you" to the so-called governments, they go ahead to fulfil what they said no matter the smallness of their hand in comparison or in contrast with the governments' hand.
That's admirable !
Had nigeria's civil executives been half as serious at governance as these murderous religio-political fanatics are at their expressed and unexpressed aims, there would have arisen very little or no violent hɛrɛm of this kind, let alone Occident-style book-learning being designated part of it.
private rigmarole
Sunday, July 1, 2012
A ɓoko hɛrɛm's admirable point
They are making things happen; they are making history, the kind of history typical of Nigeria.
The most prominent stuff operating in Nigeria, or better, operating Nigeria nowadays may not be deserving of any good word. But somethings of theirs are admirable; at least to the writer of this.
Should I put it this way: Can such seriousness of purpose still be found among Nigerians? Or are the "actors" non-Nigerians? Or is it that Nigerians seriously UNITE only for unconstructive endeavours? This people are tempting me to review my faith about the Nigerian.
Having swum thru much of the social streams of Nigeria...I have become embossed with a nagging conclusion that, apart from a relatively few non-typicals, no two Nigerians [ever] agree on anything in practice. When they pretend to do, the agreement rarely last beyond one month. And so nigerians' unity on issues always exists on paper pages and screens of television sets only.
These apostles of ulterior agenda are unknowingly presenting themselves as different. Different, 'disciplined' ( if not expert) strategists with sufficient seriousness of intention. When they say " We'll attack you" to the so-called government, they go ahead to fulfil what they said no matter the smallness of their hand in comparison or in contrast with the government's hand.
That's admirable !
Had nigeria's civil executives been half as serious at governance as these murderous religio-political fanatics are at their expressed and unexpressed aims, there would have arisen very little or no violent hɛrɛm of this kind, let alone Occident-style book-learning being a designated part of it.
The most prominent stuff operating in Nigeria, or better, operating Nigeria nowadays may not be deserving of any good word. But somethings of theirs are admirable; at least to the writer of this.
Should I put it this way: Can such seriousness of purpose still be found among Nigerians? Or are the "actors" non-Nigerians? Or is it that Nigerians seriously UNITE only for unconstructive endeavours? This people are tempting me to review my faith about the Nigerian.
Having swum thru much of the social streams of Nigeria...I have become embossed with a nagging conclusion that, apart from a relatively few non-typicals, no two Nigerians [ever] agree on anything in practice. When they pretend to do, the agreement rarely last beyond one month. And so nigerians' unity on issues always exists on paper pages and screens of television sets only.
These apostles of ulterior agenda are unknowingly presenting themselves as different. Different, 'disciplined' ( if not expert) strategists with sufficient seriousness of intention. When they say " We'll attack you" to the so-called government, they go ahead to fulfil what they said no matter the smallness of their hand in comparison or in contrast with the government's hand.
That's admirable !
Had nigeria's civil executives been half as serious at governance as these murderous religio-political fanatics are at their expressed and unexpressed aims, there would have arisen very little or no violent hɛrɛm of this kind, let alone Occident-style book-learning being a designated part of it.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
who make nigeria bleed
Obodo ndị ohi na-achị, ọ na adị n'udo? Obodo ọbụ ndị omèk'omè na-abụ Eze, ọ na adị enwe nganihu? {= a Nation présided over by criminals, does it ever have peace!? Does it ever make progress?!}
----a Musician.
----a Musician.
...A Naijeriya ba mu bi doka. Unka bi doka, za a ce baka da wayo... {...in Nigeria, we do not conduct our affairs in accordance with the intentions of the Law; if you do things according to law, people will say that you're not clever...}
---- Respondent to a questionaire
We have known from long experience that it is Crime that causes Poverty. Not vice versa. Crime and ignorance.
Then the poverty nurtures, ramifies and becomes the perpetuity base for the crime and its ramifications.
Generally, Nigerians are funny, whether they shout "allahu akbar" or "alleluiah". Do they really believe their words? Some of them asked their chief, Mr Jonathan, to pray so that God will deliver nigerians from their enemies.
And by "enemies" they're evidently referring to the jihadist terrorists...
As if nigeria has been socially (& morally) healthy, and suddenly some arant enemies from unknown outside started diseasing her.
Whoever knows nigeria and nigerians well would know also that the bombings & the bombers are not enemies of nigeria but some of nigeria's (by-)products. They are her fruits; fruits of nigerianities & nigerianisms accummulated over a long period and still accummulating...
Ok, which or how many nigerians: be they groups or individuals, would not bomb and shoot if they feel confident (if they have enough 'iron') of maximizing their political and financial gains thereby?
In this way, the present bombers are not diff'rent from most other nigerians. They're merely exercising a sensationalized variant of their nigerian-ness 'earlier' and internationally...
Civil freedom has virtually disappeared from Nigeria. Largely because law-forces mostly enforce lawlessness, not law.
Sufficient "iron", "bank cheques", & greed-blinded psychophants: and law(-enforcement) would come submitting to you; you'd be licenced indirectly to be breaching public interest by the very institutions that ought to hound you down.
I think that anyones who want to reform nigeria should start, after reforming themselves, by changing radically the processes of enlisting law enforcement agents. Get courageous and straightforward people who believe in nigeria, if anyones (among nigerians) still do. Train, equip and mandate them to live or die for the upkeep of the intentions of the laws of the land.
Churches (assemblies of ritual worshippers) are hardly places of moral or ethical refuge any longer.
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
