MY FEELINH ABOUT THE KILLING
Brain-wash(ing) education, brainwash education is causing complication & insecurity everywhere; I don't knooow why...----Marxwel Udọ (musician)
Ọdịghị mma mmadụ ịdị ka ihe e ji kọọ ya ọnụ {It's not proper for a man to assume the nature of the nuisance as which he has been derisively caricatured}----Moses Alugburu (one of very few Nigerians who remain'd consistently worthy of trust when I transacted with'im)
I do hear & do read about "agent provocateur". And we do joke that if one wants to cage a fowl, especially domestic chick, place grains of corn or rice in a line into the cage. The chicken lacks both the intelligence and the intellect requisite for evaluating anything beyond the grains of rice.
But like an anti-Sesse Seko rebel in then Zaïre who in turn "got strogly fed up" with Kabilah said, after Laurent Desirée Kabila was murdered: we don't like this killing, this death; we don't believe in killing people. We believe in changing for the better the evil system that makes some of us (appear to be) enemies in the views of some others of us.
Of course moral & social sanity demand that one "believe not" in killing, or even injuring any humanbeing else excepting 'lawfully convicted, sentenced, criminals'.
...condolences to the family, friend, relations, nation & admirers of the deceased victims & the survivors...
*I feel that who kills other people because he has been insulted deserves something more or worse than insult. (And because the killed were not verified to be involved in the insulting; and the killer didn't even mind to find out the real source & the nature & aim of the insult, & the actual insulter...) he deserves Guantanamo Bay; he deserves the death-gases released into some cave-chambers in Afghanistan during USA's ealier hunt for their arch-friend turned arch-enemy.
I wonder why people capable of sanity refuse to be sane. Why do people who say they worship Allah, and who despise others for not worshipping exactly in their manner, constitute themselves fuses that ignite further dis-worshipping of God?
Can't they wait for a few days or a week: to "look", to peep into the cloud of things--events & nonevents? This is 'an insult'; not a physical aggression. Even if it is, are they their god's god?
An un-ignorable probability exists: the 'insult' exuding from that artwork was not aimed at the grand prophet of mussulimism, nor at genuine practicers of islam. Instead, it is aimed at able-bodied but thoughtless worms; intendedly they would brainlessly (visionlessly) take certain well know actions of their inclination that will justify real anti-islamism, generally or in some regions or nations...
This sort of thing reminds me of a priest expelled from priesthood in Georgia (E Europe). Although he was no longer a christian either by conduct or by office, he continued to lead others, especially the youth, into unspeakable atrocities in his locality in the name of christianism.
Some years before now, a great bookwriter wrote a book (or books?) specifically intended (or maybe, sincerely unintended. Just a work of artistic flavour) to degrade the prophethood and messiahship of Jesus the Christ. How did the believers in & apologetics of this Unique prophet respond? They first studied the book well. Then they brought forth counter-narratives as appealing as--some more appealing than--the great book. Defence websites (e.g. www.jesusdecoded.com) sprang up, constructed by (the) defenders of the christian religion's faith.
Now, what's the status of the book(s)? It's a best-seller; but just one of the many best-sellers there are. Nothing more.
Had those who felt insulted taken to the use of brutish might, they'd have achieved for the gifted writer what he would never have achieved by only writing & publishing a book. And the INTELLECTual creativity involved in & expanded by the processes of contructing those responses would've been lost too.
Had "the people" waited a bit and "looked", instead of following and opportunedly raising the morale of "the killers", they'd have seen the finger or even a whole hand of the facultative enemies of human progress. The hand is what deserves being cut down (not embassy officers or anyone else merely branded) using different strategies & tactics.
Remember, there's a monstrous Mussolini in Ụrụ-shalima desperately designing all sorts of ways with his co-(oil) robbers, the Hitlers in Washing-town, to increase misery among mankind.
Monday, September 17, 2012
Sunday, September 16, 2012
CLASSIFIED GOSSIP (2)
two yet-peaceful countries. Benin's so fraught with 'organisations non-Gouvernementales', I wonder what else of sociality,organisation-wise, do people engage in. Is NGO-ism all?
Then look further at the peaceless ones undergoing, or recov'ring from, turmoils, natural and human-contrived...
They say he 'savvy book'; so there's no doubt the Jo' knows the implications of these & more. But they are his internal & external power roots; a sort of political investment. His techno-phobic attitudes: under his watch, the industry of real industrializers was not only figuratively but also literally being burnt down...so that no gifted indigenous substitute could breach the profit of local compradors & their off-shore masters, typify this.
When you depend on others, especially territorial & political foreigners, for your basic food, basic medicine, basic education,--things you are yourself capable of--you are, or have become at best, an appendage of those others, or something worse: a marionette in their hand; no matter how well you try at rationalizing your laziness or incompetence or... as interdependence of nations.
Government for the profit of foreign bodies.
The government chairmanship of Mr Gudlock was throwing away somethings that any technosophic or techno-philic authority would rejoice to have.
Then look further at the peaceless ones undergoing, or recov'ring from, turmoils, natural and human-contrived...
They say he 'savvy book'; so there's no doubt the Jo' knows the implications of these & more. But they are his internal & external power roots; a sort of political investment. His techno-phobic attitudes: under his watch, the industry of real industrializers was not only figuratively but also literally being burnt down...so that no gifted indigenous substitute could breach the profit of local compradors & their off-shore masters, typify this.
When you depend on others, especially territorial & political foreigners, for your basic food, basic medicine, basic education,--things you are yourself capable of--you are, or have become at best, an appendage of those others, or something worse: a marionette in their hand; no matter how well you try at rationalizing your laziness or incompetence or... as interdependence of nations.
Government for the profit of foreign bodies.
The government chairmanship of Mr Gudlock was throwing away somethings that any technosophic or techno-philic authority would rejoice to have.
Friday, September 14, 2012
CLASSIFIED GOSSIP (1)
Much of the so-called state secrets or classified information is often merely labelled so. They are neither secrets nor stately. Classified rubbish is what they are. Determined & methodic observers (with some gymnastic flexibility of mind) who "look hard enough" will always see thru the cover... Plus the presence of some hands from among the keepers of the nebules and boxes of the 'secrets' who deliberately remove the cover or flash an illumination...out of grievance or sympathy or love of private profit; in which instance one won't have to "look hard" to be able to scoop "things" into one's conscious awareness.
So Nigerian officials who quickly blamed Jamaat ul Ahlil Sunna lidawati Wal Jihad
(ɓoko-hɛrem) over "leaked" data... seem to me to be running faster ahead of what they are chasing; unless they prove they spoke from thorough inquest, and not from speculation and convoluted defence of official carelessness, dutilessness or even sabotage.
* * *
Let's say it the way it is: that in Nigeria, those who complained of prez Jonathan's payments to the "area soldiers" of the ocean-front around the mouth of River Niger didn't do so because of the economic injustice or the uneconomic-ness (of) policy those huge payments represent. They complained at the fact that they are not yet included among the beneficiaries of that (soft) injustice; perhaps also for no prospects of ever being included. You know, nigerian Nigerians want lux by ALL means & methods, even when it's obvious that keeping to or staying in such luxury constitutes an imminent disaster. This is in Nigeria.
But there're other facets.
I can gossip loudly now: The Jo' and his co-cavorters 'don't give a dam' not because of sureness of loyalty of the national army (if the official armed agencies of Nigeria can still be called national. I feel they are more factually described as a huge & very varied petro-dollar army) or constitutional backing. It's because of the apparently surer
money-procured loyalty of the gun-goons of the Niger creeks. With such huge payments, which are not even enough for their intended purposes, the "generals" & their "boys" will be able to maintain a life-style of relative lux & a conglomeration of formidable arsenals (capable of frightening Osama of Laden & his USAmérican friends into forgoing an attack or "thinking twice" of any planned aggression)...
In a dreadfully segregated society as this, whose unity is based far more on distrust than on trust (a new visitor concentrating on the ceremonials will be fooled; but will understand when he appraises the informal realities), suppose the northern marauders succeed in procuring saboteurs from among The Jo's "prætorian guards" to aggresse him and his nearests, that's, suppose they ask (him) "the dreaded once-in-a-lifetime question, who'll answer them?
Is it the talk-talking, sybaritic,
english grammarians & church-talkers of SW Nigeria? Is it the unrealistic self-kidnapping able-bodied of SE Nigeria, who: what they lack in politicality they make up in internecine criminality. Even the mediocre political sense, the only level of politics Africa seems capable of, is above'em.
Intra-Nigerianly, the man, Jonathan, is pragmatic after all; he knows Nigeria(ns) enough to know where to set his foothold s...
But this strand of Nigeria's fabric of militiae are "doing something", at least guarding against "security agents" sabotaging petrol(eum) transport lines...
OTHER FACETS
1.
National & sub-national legislatives' culture of resource-squandering elitism...
2.
EFCC's confraternisation with thieves: it spends 3 or more times what it struggles to recover, in billions of...
3.
The Federal Central Territory (FCT) has been declared officially out-of-bound to the poor, in a Nigeria of probably 99% beggarly populace...
4.
The (impending) islamic bank is just another in the line of conceptions of the loot...
5.
And what about Mr Jo's gradual re-insertion of Nigeria into the sleeve-pockets of Worldbank, IMF, and some other institutions of foreigner con-artistry?
6.
How do you explain his signing off huge amounts of money into foreigners' purses thru "Innovative Action on AIDS"? When no real actions, let alone innovative ones, are taken in housing & agriculture...
Is Mr Jo', up till now ignorant of the facts that AIDS-promoting NGO's represent a fraudulent estab' of central north America; that they incorporate elements of medical truth in a huge broth of medical fraud to make dupes of peoples globally, thereby keeping themselves in lucrative but abominable careers? Like portable télephones, the AIDS-business is harmfully bottomless...
Even if "sympathy for the sick" makes him tolerate the near-intolerable AIDS-born public dupings, can't he see that no country infested by foreigner-funded NGO's advances (industrially)? Besides, such NGO's are conductors of "foreign state pirates"...
They are de-industrializers and de-stabilizers...
Just look at Bolivia & Bénin,
So Nigerian officials who quickly blamed Jamaat ul Ahlil Sunna lidawati Wal Jihad
(ɓoko-hɛrem) over "leaked" data... seem to me to be running faster ahead of what they are chasing; unless they prove they spoke from thorough inquest, and not from speculation and convoluted defence of official carelessness, dutilessness or even sabotage.
* * *
Let's say it the way it is: that in Nigeria, those who complained of prez Jonathan's payments to the "area soldiers" of the ocean-front around the mouth of River Niger didn't do so because of the economic injustice or the uneconomic-ness (of) policy those huge payments represent. They complained at the fact that they are not yet included among the beneficiaries of that (soft) injustice; perhaps also for no prospects of ever being included. You know, nigerian Nigerians want lux by ALL means & methods, even when it's obvious that keeping to or staying in such luxury constitutes an imminent disaster. This is in Nigeria.
But there're other facets.
I can gossip loudly now: The Jo' and his co-cavorters 'don't give a dam' not because of sureness of loyalty of the national army (if the official armed agencies of Nigeria can still be called national. I feel they are more factually described as a huge & very varied petro-dollar army) or constitutional backing. It's because of the apparently surer
money-procured loyalty of the gun-goons of the Niger creeks. With such huge payments, which are not even enough for their intended purposes, the "generals" & their "boys" will be able to maintain a life-style of relative lux & a conglomeration of formidable arsenals (capable of frightening Osama of Laden & his USAmérican friends into forgoing an attack or "thinking twice" of any planned aggression)...
In a dreadfully segregated society as this, whose unity is based far more on distrust than on trust (a new visitor concentrating on the ceremonials will be fooled; but will understand when he appraises the informal realities), suppose the northern marauders succeed in procuring saboteurs from among The Jo's "prætorian guards" to aggresse him and his nearests, that's, suppose they ask (him) "the dreaded once-in-a-lifetime question, who'll answer them?
Is it the talk-talking, sybaritic,
english grammarians & church-talkers of SW Nigeria? Is it the unrealistic self-kidnapping able-bodied of SE Nigeria, who: what they lack in politicality they make up in internecine criminality. Even the mediocre political sense, the only level of politics Africa seems capable of, is above'em.
Intra-Nigerianly, the man, Jonathan, is pragmatic after all; he knows Nigeria(ns) enough to know where to set his foothold s...
But this strand of Nigeria's fabric of militiae are "doing something", at least guarding against "security agents" sabotaging petrol(eum) transport lines...
OTHER FACETS
1.
National & sub-national legislatives' culture of resource-squandering elitism...
2.
EFCC's confraternisation with thieves: it spends 3 or more times what it struggles to recover, in billions of...
3.
The Federal Central Territory (FCT) has been declared officially out-of-bound to the poor, in a Nigeria of probably 99% beggarly populace...
4.
The (impending) islamic bank is just another in the line of conceptions of the loot...
5.
And what about Mr Jo's gradual re-insertion of Nigeria into the sleeve-pockets of Worldbank, IMF, and some other institutions of foreigner con-artistry?
6.
How do you explain his signing off huge amounts of money into foreigners' purses thru "Innovative Action on AIDS"? When no real actions, let alone innovative ones, are taken in housing & agriculture...
Is Mr Jo', up till now ignorant of the facts that AIDS-promoting NGO's represent a fraudulent estab' of central north America; that they incorporate elements of medical truth in a huge broth of medical fraud to make dupes of peoples globally, thereby keeping themselves in lucrative but abominable careers? Like portable télephones, the AIDS-business is harmfully bottomless...
Even if "sympathy for the sick" makes him tolerate the near-intolerable AIDS-born public dupings, can't he see that no country infested by foreigner-funded NGO's advances (industrially)? Besides, such NGO's are conductors of "foreign state pirates"...
They are de-industrializers and de-stabilizers...
Just look at Bolivia & Bénin,
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
