al Qaeda Of America

Have you noticed that American militiarists and the qaeda of Osama booomb-Laden (someone has said: Ozama gBim!Laden) are best friends, fanatics, terrorists, comrades in bloodshedding. Those of America’s even surpass(ed) in this queer entreprise with the addition of eco-political rapes around the world to their list of championships.

All of them (terrorist antiterrorists and their terrorist target-friends) are on the same side of the (my) scale of values.
I admire America’s (USA’s) leaders: religional, political, scientific (including arts and aesthetics). They have a very wide vision of the world…and more…and beyond…
But nowadays, some executive choices and actions of the militarian politicians there horrify me. They seem only more and more intrersted in making composts of human flesh. They seem to forget that the USA’s ideal of liberty and responsibility (and the Christian?? Civilization that founded it) presupposes that the wavy dreams (ambitions) of some must not be more important than the horny realities (circumstance and way of life) of others…

To me, the sinister military re-build-up in Af’ is not as much for the fight against the Qaeda as it is for advance intimidation (in readiness for probable eventual assault) contre any other entities in the region, excepting Israel, who’d dare raise their head in opposition to wasteful, militant, Americanism or what they call “interest”, a euphemism for cultural and economic cannibalism. (Somewhat the USA see the world as their economic asset that must never be dissident let a-lone rebellious…)

Most of NATO, since 1999, has proven to be more of a destructive apparatus than a constructive one; most of its constituents is beni-oui-oui…

More out of national ego(ism) than concern for safety, liberty and justice, in the name of Mr. Barack-a-Hussein Obama, the presidency of modern Zion is popularly swimming into, not out from, the ocean; the ocean of human blood!
Nazi fuhrer (Mr. Hi’ler) accumulated sufficient military hardware and personnel―and strategy―to pulverize the whole world of his time in proof of his claim to superhumanship. He nearly succeeded; but then he failed woefully; a failure that was ever inevitable had he succeeded or not.
Many a German proved that not all Germans were Nazi murderers. A USA that was instrumental in deflecting that world-waster nazism the bloody way, ought to shine the light that there is better, more, to superpowerhood (a mentality that ought to disappear…) than peaceless, restless, reputation of military invincibility. Unless they only want to create bombastic relics for historians of the next millennium.

Too soon (less than a century) after Nazi’s kriegs!
Is it the example of Sri Lanka_

“We will not negotiate with enemy” or “The killing must not stop until we kill all the terrorists” sounds greatly patriotic only when the presence of computerized bombers, superarmoured vehicles and virtually inexhaustible armouries make one feel on the invincible side.
Unveil the bases (the spring-boards) from which most of modern terrors, like those of the Qaeda, sprang or springs forth, and negotiation will become justified; not a humiliation but a reconnection with justice, with humaneness…

If the Qaeda and its representatives and representeds consist only of heart-less murderers who neither listen to good music nor appreciate the unalloyed visages of infants; if it is as indiscriminately lawless and brutish as some propagandists want us to believe, why is it not bombing China (the People’s Republic)? Why is it not firing at Brazil? Why are France and Germany et al not in its bull’s eye? Why doesn’t it mention Japan with even the countenance of unfriendliness?

Consider also the usual half of the consequence of these redundant military dramas: the en masse harming and destruction of the defenceless or the harmless…These create more terrorists than removed, especially when based on pretexts…

There are certainly other ways… had the world not been filled with sentiments and love of destruction…
Even the principle of … the enforcement of “no fly zone” is infinitely cheaper.

And the so-called Free Market. Free Market ought to be fundamentally re-evaluated. Is ‘Free Market’ not a good name for a bundle of bad things? Is not Free market greedily making dupes of peoples, unnecessarily giving them weapons and hunger, sometimes even sicknesses and deformities, launching them into massive frustrations? I sometimes marvel that there are not more overt branded-terrorists than there are already…
Brutalites, whether in gentle or fierce injustice, to people for some individuals’ or nations’ ego or high-standard-living-ism, hardly ever fail to elicit some terror in reaction. Think of Mahdism in Sudan some years ago…Think also of other times and places where a culture had interacted with another on the plane of arrogance…
The reality of today has become that the more aggressive cannot be as victorious as they used to...

If “the killing must continue” as they say, “ until all the killers are killed”, who shall not be(come) a killer… and be killed?

Must the USA reach their aim over the dead bodies of half of humanity; half of humanity that may turn out to include the very United-States-of-America themselves?!