A DEATH PLOT AGAINST AFRICA

There are somethings morally inconsistent, unintelligent, in the activities of some Non-Governmental Organizations in Africa. After saturating Africa with the noise of AIDS, a noise that is already becoming unimportant to a hungry and war-wearied continent, they turn to a more dangerous gamble. If they succeed, their prize would be the real destruction of Africa(ns).

Some NGO's are capitalizing on the gullibility of this continent, where most people and governments drink from what foreigners brought to them without first finding out whether it is water or urine. They are now telling the African mother that she is in bondage; to gain liberation, she has to kill her children, kill her babies babies without compunction.
I wonder about the kind of conscience these NGO agents have that the most prior need they perceive in the South-of-Sahara Africa is the democratization of abortion.

They come to such a country as Nigeria and lobby with hefty bribes, the lawmakers, most of whom are fake democrats who make policies for sale, or get money in advance of making them, to legalize abortion. They give it different names that sound all right while the intent is all wrong. This is attempting to enlarge an already large sore. Most African states are murderous, genocidally inclined. Why induce the African mother to partake in the silent aspects of this evil.
Many people would continue to avoid some evil if it cannot be perpetrated legally.

It is evil to obligate the African women, as poor as they are, to pay and kill their babies, in the name of Reproductive Health.
If you dispose of a dog and procure a monkey, you still possess a disposable nuisance. Talking about saving life and at same time enacting the termination of healthy pregnancies is morally inconsistent.

None of the things African women need is abortion. Abortion does not reduce maternal mortality; it has no positive effect on the women; it rather traumatizes them. Besides, it destroys the society which the NGO's insincerely seek to preserve. When the veneer of affection that the mother has for the fruit of her womb is removed just for commercial interest, a murderous society will emerge; then a dead society.

Where is the democratic decency here: you have freedom and you use it to destroy yourself and others including the most guiltless of souls? Is capitalism, based on buyers' demand, not in this way going to destroy the buyers?

What women of Africa need are food, literacy, economic skill (not the file-pushing things of celebs and government-harlots), protection from destructive violence, a positive change in the land tenure systems et sequens. We are poor because of many things. None of those things has to do with abortion. It is not because there is not enough abortion or enough use of condoms (all for the continuance of NGO's markets).

When the rights of unborn human babies to live is sidestepped for commercial gains, the essential value of Governmental Organizations and Non-Governmental Organizations is voided.
That is why we rail against rulers of Africa. They waste the continent's resources on frivolities...their people waste in despondency.

I cannot be convinced that procuring abortion will increase a woman's income, keep robbers and rapists away from her,minimize government's extortion, reduce or remove her superstitousness, make her a choice-worthy corporate manager, and make her more satisfied with her life. I cannot.

Why not teach them how not to conceive when pregnancy is unwanted, in the first place? When people teach other people to kill their defence-less offspring as an enjoyment of liberty, they are destroying the essence of liberty. Murderers are not free.

Winfrey has demonstrated in SouthAfrica one of what should be done...
We know that innocence (the African woman is often referred to as traditional and innocent) is not freedom; but neither is guilt.
Liberation of women by abortion is an acute desecration of motherhood.

This kind of freedom is too untidy. I am against it.