Mal-Assumptions

?? Things Often Said Or Assumed That Are Not Factual The Core


1. That Nigeria is abounding in human resources:

*Not true.
There are lots of humanbeings. But they are not assets; they are mostly liabilities, human liabilities, ethically void folks. Yet they are redeemable... While there are human assets, human liabilities outnumber and outweigh them massively.
Nigerian youths are a huge army of exuberant people, battalions of which are woefully mis-orientated by generations of unconscionable mis-leaders, which include teachers and parents.

Nigeria is fraught with opportunity-monger(ing)s, "lazy activeness". 100 of 101 Nigerians "often look for opportunity". They work hard, very hard, at taking "the opportunity" from one another, and from others they could gain access to, by force of violence or of tricks.
This may be a fact everywhere. But why are some socio-political groupings far more welcoming; and others almost intolerably repulsive to civilized minds?
Rats never concern themselves with producing cereal grains, yet they are very hard workers...in unsealed grain-stores.

Genuine workers in Nigeria often have to do more than their work: they often have to ward off murderers, robbers, blackmailers, incriminators, assailants, extremely corrupt bureaucrats... They often have "lots of responsibilities" and "very little rights". Of course, when a people work very hard and achieve very little positively for long periods, save a scattered, far-fetched, aggrandized individuals, their hard work becomes or constructs a set of questions: on what, for what, by what, in what: do they work hard?
Nigeria is abounding more in 'Metamorphic Predators' than in human resources!

Lagos, a cosmopolis, typifies Nigeria. And it is a dense human laboratory.The vast majority of the denizens consists of Nigerians. Situations that an expert observer would need several months in some places to get a repeat (to study actions and reactions) present themselves several times a week in Lagos. So in 12 months, a recording observer can make fairly accurate or conclusive statements on the deep-rooted mental culture (psycho-emotional, behavioral...) and customs or orientations of Nigerians.
Most schools (so-called educational institutions) have practically become systems of marrying (certifying) individualistic greed and laziness into the minds, especially of the youth. Here, one can get excellently qualified engineers who can't, or better, won't fix a nurt. Because that involves doing something rather than making impressions of (fake) grandness. People hone their talents for maximum use in deceit.*

I have seen mechanics "spike" the road, several times...They dressed like workers laying optic fibre cables underground. That's their kind of hard work: giving other people flat tyres...
In ethical integrity, most Nigerians are a mass of dross.


2.That America (USA) is promoting democracy in the world.

*Non!
USA is internally democratic to a considerable extent. Externally, USA is far more interested in maintaining her hyperpowerhood than in any 'Cracy that is 'demo-genic', 'demo-oriented' and 'demo-destined'...America's sense of democracy in regard to other peoples is stoogehood: they should be subservient to her whims. However democratic any people are, if they become a threat to America's sense of superiority and firstness in the world, USA would ill-brand them undemocratic. StateDepartment would seek a "regime change". The intel' agency (ACIA=CIA) would want to render them helpless by all means.
But if you're "co-operative" while operating a tyranny or a "killer-cracy", why, the StateDepartment will work with you. Within the past half century, USA (has) ruined the democracies of several peoples, even to the point of large-scale civil wars...
We respect Americans ( and the British) for vocally defining for us the concept of human rights. Good. But America is not practicing her words. At most, not outside America and her interests.

3. That Mo' Ibrahim Foundation is promoting good governance in Africa.

*That's not yet; probably never shall be.
Mo Ibrahim Foundation is regaling some "fortunate" out-of-office leaders, not promoting good leadership among in-office leaders. Such a Foundation is good. But...
Indeed, the last two, which were also the first two, awardees of the foundation's prizes: Chissano and Mogae, were meritorious. But the machinations of selection depict that in the very proximal future, the Foundation may become a laundry system for very dirty African (mis)leaders and prodigal governments. Villains and traitors would be laundered into the images of heroes.

Besides, intransitive sanctions (denial of prizes), absence of intimate punitive engagements are pointless against determined rogues and public cankers. "I'll not give you the prize because you're, or have been, a bad leader" will not instil a good change, not even a fear in other bad leaders. Essentially they do not need the prize. Until a real threat or threats to their esential needs {personal freedom, utter lack of recognition (not by US or Britain or Russia...)} is instituted, determined mis-leaders may not be discouraged.
And how many of the hungry souls of Africa does the Foundation prepare to be good leaders?

Recent significant political events, apart from Messrs Mbeki and Kufuor who obeyed the law they vowed to defend and enforce, show that the sense of decency among the generality of African leaders is too subjective. Nigeria and Kenya. The geatest neglecters of socio-political morality, the greatest abusers of constitutional legality, were also the loudest preachers of rule of law. Kibaki and Obasanjo restlessly but heartlessly urged their surviving co-contestants to go to the courts, to follow the rule of law; playing murderer and deliverer at once.

4. That Africans are more communal spirited than other peoples of the world.

*That's become a bull-shitted concept.
Little exceptions are there. But the practical facts nowadays are that native Africans are extremely individualistic, materialistic... only that, unlike other (types of) peoples, they lack the will for positive material, technological and political creativeness that satisfy at least some basic yearnings natively. This makes the materialisms of Africa's materialists (Africa's powerful possessionists, material acquisitionists) take much more nagative toll on them than those of other peoples do on themselves. People hardly ever invent or improve (on) anything here. But they want to personally, privately, possesse every possesse-able, even the impossesse-able, needed or not.

5. That state bail-outs (example: America's hundreds of billions of dollars...) will save the economy, the world economy, and even the world environment.

*Not likely. May be very temporarily.
If you want to save a Greed-battered world, deal with the greed. Govern the people with unfailing governance so that their greed (the greed of the greediest) will stop destroying the wellness of the world.
While greed causes people to want to get or produce more, it also causes them to destroy more, to waste more. Capitalist greed goads people to work against their neighbours, including the physical environment, for maximum private profit.
You cannot calculate the wellness of the world and its human creatures in billions of dollars. You will unfailingly fail to be correct.

Capitalism or non-capitalism, if the controls are absent or too weak to minimize or prevent wasteful greed, the system will always be prone to woeful failure. (What did the sub-prime mortgagees do with what they obtained? And what did the hope-based superprime leasers intend?)

Good economy depends largely on good hearts, good people; not on the names of the system.
Good executives who love the goods and service of life and also allow others the chance to love same too; economics that neither trades in gods nor in humanbeings. Profits should be made for (the) people; not people for the profits.

Obscene it is to benefit from the calamity of others; worse even, to create the calamities. Unconscionable it is that a world full of wealth and improved ways of living is much fuller of privation and ill-health.

I wish there is only one, universal, trustworthy, government.

6. That the removal of Mr. Mugabe would be the ultimate solution to the problemms of Zimbabwe

*Not true
The old man is not even as much the problem as those calumniating him. He was attempting to solve some of the problems... under heavy fire from the problem-makers.

Des Rapports Sexuelles Interdites

N'importe quelle société humain, le genre de leur expression sexuels est un des matières important de la securite, ou non, de les gens. Les juives anciens étaient excellent et intéressants . Lorsque la plupart des hommes au monde étaient dépravé en leur façons de relations sexuels, les gens hébreux du rameau juif ont reconnus discrètement que l'inceste et des autres coquinerie sexuels apportent des effets maux aux descendants. Les mal effets peuvent durer.
Ils ordonnèrent les lois pour empêcher des mauvais facon de vivre. Ils comprirent bien qu'en milieu des vertus humain se trouve la fidélité sexuelle.

Des maints siècles tard, beaucoup des parts du monde n'étaient encore se renseignée en l'issue. Par exemple: le pontife suprême de l'empire romain, Julius Caezar, s'exprima qu'il est un homme aussi bien qu'une femme a tout homme.

Au l'epoque-la, on y a des temples oue les marchandes de services sexuelles (spécialement prostituée féminins) vendirent ce qu'elles y tinrent. Elles ne comptèrent rien a faire des rapports sexuelles avec ses enfants (garçons) ou ses parents (pères).

Mantenant, dans cet ère dont y déjà de lasser-faire a faire d'étude et de recherche oue on gagnent des connaissances; quand des animaux autrefois pensée de être dénue de sens (des poissons, des chevaux, des oiseaux...) ont été trouvée a exprimer leur sexualité au manières qui faire exclure d'inceste et d'homosexualité, il y a des hommes qui s'abusent encore leur intégrité et celles de leur descendants sexuellement. On dit que ces sont des droits humains!
Quelque "droits humains" ne sont qu'une désir aa être étourdi et diabolique. Mais la race humain a passe l'étage d'ignorance. Elle est simplement tetu, cherchant de auto-souillure.

Associes Sexuelles Interdites Aux Mâles

1. Mère
2. Belle-mere
3. Soeur
4. Demi-soeur
5. Belle-soeur
6. Tante
7. Fille
8. Petite-fille
9. Belle-fille
10. Femme et sa fille (seulement une d'elles comme une épouse)
11. Femme et sa petite-fille
12. Soeurs de même parents (seulement l'une ou l'autre)
13. Voisin marie
14. Homme (mâle pareil)
15. les Animaux
16. la Femme pendant des menstruations

Tout celles-ci et des autres implicite {comme (la nièce,) le neveu, le gendre...} sont aussi applicables au des femmes avec les contre-parties mâles ou femmes.
Aujourd'hui, c'est l'époque après Moise. Mais les exercice en la santé ensembles instituée par Moise selon la volonté de l'Eternel se tient des valeurs salutaires comme d'origine.

Les Juives anciens, les gens du Moise, étaient avancée et différents positivement entre leur voisins ignorants.

What Hamas Means

I have been a witness ( nearly the centre-point victim) in an encounter with armed robbers where one of the goons warned one of us passengers with a gun shot in the face. "I warn you this boy !," he interjected. And simultaneously ejected some slugs into the "boy's" skull. The "boy" was a full-grown man. He spent the next night and half in a hospital where the bullets, which went in through his mouth, taking two of his teeth, lodged in the bone beneath the ridge of his nose, were extracted. Miraculously unusual, the man returned on his feet. He also uttered the words (that's with great effort, made the speech) of his survival celebration by himself.

I have not seen; but I have always heard... Hamas...

I was trying to get the point in Israel's concentrated aerial and terrestrial forces' assault on (against) the Hamas-ed people of Palestine. Was it in reaction to an action or to a perceived intent? How could such a ferocious reaction be to an action or actions that has not been taken?

Then several reports came, having it that Hamas-men launched war missiles into Israel to warn the israelis...in protest against the closure of a capricious thoroughfare.
At this, I sifted (discriminated) my way to a locus. Israel did what she ought to do: defend herself against unwaranted aggression.

If someone warned you by shooting you on the head, as the bandit did to my co-passenger, you'd not need an analyst, strategist or diviner to understand that when the Warner enacts the actual assault, It will exterminate you and yours. Unless you and yours have a willingness to be capital martyrs by default, you'll have to act or react accordingly.

The amount of rocket already expended by Hamas shows that It was into something far more than protest or warning.
Had Israel not (re)acted...

Besides, as always, Hamas did not take into consideration the vulnerable folks in its domain before embarking on aggressive actions.
There is injustice. Yet these defence-less and offence-less souls could have been considered better by Israel et al than they have been by Hamas. Apparently, the world will be worse of in Hamas' hands...

Now, Hamas, according to some UN's projected reports, was at least partially, donation-dependent. How got It the surplus resource for the accumulation of such huge arsenal? Must it spend its wealth in warring?
Hamas was doing one thing: justifying the presumptive suspicion of many that Its religion; Its economics; its politics; its philosophy, its everything is not of peace, therefore not for peaceable people. That he is not yet born who can enact peace in Canaan!

I do not like bloodshedding. But I like even much less, thoughtlesly relentless provocators of bloodshedding.
Hamas is a Harm-Mass (harmers). Who likes harm? Who likes a harming mass of suicidal genocides?